Leading Teams
Section updated .
Leading teams through communication comes down to four practices: listen to the whole account before you decide, pair high standards with an honest assurance when you give criticism, invite the objections people actually hold, and explain decisions, with their criteria and open questions, before anyone has to ask. Each page names its source, marks how strong the evidence is, and ends with a check you can make within a day.
Managers influence mostly through ordinary meetings: the one-on-one, the review of a draft, the decision announcement. These are the moments where people decide how much to tell you. The research behind these four pages is on listening, feedback, employee voice and fairness, and it is clear on some points and thin on others. Where a result comes from a laboratory or a school and not from a workplace, the page says so.
The practices are invitations. Each one works the same when the other person knows exactly what you are doing and why, and each page shows the sentence you could say out loud to announce it.
Practices in this section
Listen before you decide
Hear the whole account in a one-on-one, recap it in their words and hold your advice until they say they are done.
Read the guide →Feedback people use
State the standard and your reason for believing the person can reach it. The study behind it is a school-based experiment, and the page says how far it extends.
Read the guide →Invite real objections
Collect written concerns before the meeting, answer the first with a question, and see why assigned devil's advocacy performed worse than real dissent.
Read the guide →Explain decisions before anyone asks
Give the decision, the criteria and what is still open, at the same time, and keep to the reasons you actually used.
Read the guide →How to use this section
Start with listening before deciding, because every other practice depends on knowing what the person thinks. Move to feedback people use before your next review of someone's work. Use inviting dissent before your next decision meeting, and finish with explaining decisions the next time you announce something that affects people.
Try one practice per week, and use its check within 24 hours: a recap they correct, a revision date kept, a concern you had not heard, a question about the details instead of the reasons.
Frequently asked questions
Which practice should a new manager start with?
Listening before deciding. It costs a few minutes in each one-on-one and gives you the information the other three practices rely on.
How strong is the evidence behind these practices?
It varies, and each page rates its own. The listening and dissent studies are mostly laboratory or single-industry studies, the feedback study is a school-based experiment, and the fairness evidence combines one field study with a meta-analysis.
Do these practices work if my team knows what I am doing?
They are meant to. Each page includes a sentence that announces the practice and the reason, and none relies on the other person being unaware.
How do I know whether a practice worked?
Each page lists checks you can make within 24 hours by watching behavior, such as whether they correct your recap or send an input before the deadline.
Does this replace HR or legal guidance?
No. This is communication guidance. It does not replace legal, therapeutic or organizational advice.
Be first when the email edition starts
The briefing is published on this site every day. The email edition is not sending yet. Leave your address and you’ll be among the first told when it starts. Nothing is sent in the meantime.