Creating & Teaching: Four Practices for Clear Content
Section updated .
Clear teaching and content rests on four practices: write down what a newcomer would not know before you explain, carry an idea inside a true, specific story and say what it is for, open a curiosity gap you close in the same piece, and state uncertainty plainly and numerically where you can. Each has a named source, an honest note on how strong the evidence is, and a check you can make within a day.
People who create, teach and speak share one problem: the audience cannot ask you what you meant. A lesson, video, newsletter or talk has to work with the listener on the other side of a screen or at the back of a room. The practices here are about the moments where that goes wrong: the explanation that skips a step, the claim that nobody pictures, the headline that does not match the piece, and the confident number that hides its doubt.
Each guide follows the same shape. It names the failure, gives the steps with words you could say, shows how the practice holds up when the audience knows exactly what you are doing, and ends with something you can observe. Where the research is thin, narrow or does not cover your situation, the guide says so.
Practices in this section
The curse of knowledge
List what a newcomer would not know before you explain, then test the explanation on one real newcomer.
Read the guide →Stories that carry ideas
Carry an idea inside a true, specific story, and say what the story is for and what it does not show.
Read the guide →Curiosity without clickbait
Open a gap you will close in the same piece, so that the content keeps the promise the headline makes.
Read the guide →Honest uncertainty
State how sure you are plainly, with a range beside the number, and keep to what the research covers.
Read the guide →How to use this section
Start with the curse of knowledge, because every other practice depends on knowing what your audience already has. Then read stories that carry ideas to choose the case that makes the idea concrete. Use curiosity without clickbait when you write the title and the opening, and finish with honest uncertainty for any number you plan to cite.
Run the newcomer check on your next lesson or draft, and the headline check on your next title. The other two can wait until a piece includes a story or a statistic.
Frequently asked questions
How do I know what my audience already knows?
You cannot judge it reliably from the inside, which is the finding behind the curse of knowledge. Ask one real newcomer to say your explanation back or try the first step, and fix the place where they stall.
Do stories really persuade people?
A 2016 meta-analysis found positive but modest links between exposure to narratives and story-consistent beliefs, attitudes, intentions and behaviors. The guide covers the limits and why you should say what a story is for.
What counts as clickbait?
On this site, a headline whose promise the content does not keep. The test is simple: ask a reader to point to the sentence that delivers what the headline offered.
Does admitting uncertainty cost me credibility?
In a large set of experiments on facts and numbers in news-style texts, a numeric range with a point estimate did not significantly reduce trust, while explicit verbal hedging lowered it somewhat. The guide explains the scope of that result.
Are these practices new?
No. Each is labelled as a durable practice, drawn from published research and presented with its limits.
Be first when the email edition starts
The briefing is published on this site every day. The email edition is not sending yet. Leave your address and you’ll be among the first told when it starts. Nothing is sent in the meantime.