RPE Load Calculator

Updated .

This calculator converts a planned set (for example 5 reps at RPE 8) into an approximate percent of your one-rep max and a working weight. RPE 10 means no repetitions left; RPE 8 means about two left in reserve. It treats the set as a count of the repetitions you could have done and applies the same arithmetic as the one-rep max estimator in reverse. The result is a starting point to adjust, because ratings of effort vary from person to person and day to day.

This tool needs JavaScript. Work it out on paper: RIR = 10 − RPE; repetitions you could do = planned reps + RIR; percent of 1RM = 1 ÷ (1 + that number ÷ 30) (100% for one repetition); working weight = 1RM × that percent. The method and a worked example below let you reach the same answer on paper.

RPE Load Calculator

The boxes start with the worked example’s hypothetical numbers. Replace them with your own.

Your plan

Use the estimator if you do not have one. The 200 shown is a hypothetical example.

A whole number from 1 to 12. The 5 shown is a hypothetical example.

RPE is your rating of how hard the set was, here tied to repetitions in reserve (RIR).

The smallest jump your plates allow, in the units above. Use 0 for no rounding. The 5 shown is a hypothetical example.

Your result

Enter your one-rep max, the repetitions you plan and the RPE

  • Repetitions in reserve (RIR) —
  • Repetitions you could do in total —
  • Approximate percent of 1RM —
  • Working weight —
  • Rounded to your plates —

Loads for 1 to 10 reps at this RPE

    Everything you type stays in your browser. Nothing is sent anywhere, and nothing is stored — reloading the page clears it.

    How it works

    The calculator uses the repetitions-in-reserve reading of the RPE scale and one equation:

    1. RIR = 10 − RPE. In the repetitions-in-reserve scale, RPE 10 is no repetitions left (0 RIR), RPE 9 is about 1, and RPE 8 is about 2.
    2. Repetitions you could do in total (n) = planned reps + RIR.
    3. Percent of 1RM = 1 ÷ (1 + n ÷ 30), which is the Epley equation solved the other way round, and 100% when n is 1. At n = 6 this gives 83.3%, in line with the statement in the RIR-based RPE literature that about 83% of 1RM is roughly a 6-repetition maximum.
    4. Working weight = 1RM × that percent, then rounded to the increment you give.

    Limits, stated plainly. The published RPE chart is based on the barbell back squat and on average scores from one group of experienced lifters. Its authors say it illustrates a relationship rather than serving as an absolute conversion, that people differ in how many repetitions they can do at the same percent of their max, and that the relationship may change for machine-based, single-joint and upper-body exercises. In their own example, the standard deviation of the ratings at 8 repetitions with 70% of 1RM was 1.2 repetitions in reserve, large enough that a rating of 1 or of 5 is possible. This tool uses a formula rather than that chart, so its percentages differ slightly from published charts, especially at low repetitions. The ACSM position stand suggests taking sets near failure, around 2 to 3 repetitions in reserve, and states that there is insufficient evidence to set exact RIR or RPE targets. Training to failure is not necessary for strength or muscle gain.

    Using the result by profile

    For A Aim for RPE 6 to 8 while you learn the lifts. The point is clean repetitions with several left in reserve, not hitting a percent. If the calculated load feels heavy, go lighter.

    For B Use RPE 7 to 9 for working sets. If the weight feels harder than planned, that is information about sleep, stress or recovery; read the readiness guide and adjust the load, not the effort.

    For C Reserve RPE 9 to 10 for planned top sets and track how the same load drifts across weeks. Compare repetitions at a fixed RPE rather than chasing a number. See deloads and plateaus.

    For D Teach RIR with a conversation, not a chart: ask how many more clean repetitions the client could have done, then compare with what the bar speed and form showed. Ratings improve with practice.

    For E Stay within the load and effort limits set by your clinician or physical therapist, even if the calculator suggests more.

    Worked example

    Suppose a hypothetical one-rep max of 200 lb, and a plan of 5 reps at RPE 8. RIR = 10 − 8 = 2. Repetitions you could do in total: 5 + 2 = 7. Percent of 1RM = 1 ÷ (1 + 7 ÷ 30) = 30 ÷ 37 = 81.1%. Working weight: 200 × 0.8108 = 162.2 lb, which rounds to 160 lb with a 5 lb increment.

    Two other hypothetical points show the shape: 3 reps at RPE 9 is n = 4, which gives 88.2%; 10 reps at RPE 7 is n = 13, which gives 69.8%, a long set at the edge of where the equation is used. These numbers are illustrative arithmetic, not a prescription.

    Frequently asked questions

    What is the difference between RPE and RIR?

    RPE is a rating of how hard a set was. RIR is how many repetitions you had left. In the repetitions-in-reserve version of the scale they map directly: RPE 10 is 0 RIR, RPE 9 is about 1 RIR, RPE 8 is about 2 RIR.

    How accurate is this for me?

    It is an approximation. The published RPE chart comes from average scores in one group of experienced lifters, mostly on a squat, and individuals differ. Use the load as a starting point and adjust to how the set really feels.

    Should I train to failure?

    The ACSM position stand found that training to momentary failure did not improve strength, muscle size or power, so it is not necessary. It suggests sets taken near failure, around 2 to 3 repetitions in reserve.

    Why do the percentages differ from other RPE charts?

    Published charts are built from lifter data, while this tool applies one formula throughout. They agree broadly but not exactly, and the gap is largest at low repetitions.

    Does this send my numbers anywhere?

    No. The calculation runs in your browser and nothing is stored or sent.